Skip to main content

The self driving car dilema

Road traffic is fundamentally a group-process. A typical a human group process. In the end human (non verbal) communication and behaviour are the flexibility layer in the process. When rules or situations are unclear, this human to human process defines the system security. This allows the strange mix of pedestrians, bicycles, car's and lories to share the same space.

For trains and other public transport this is less the case. These are primarily system rules based apparatus. People have to adapt to these rules. And are flexible enough to do so. And because people are aware of this, they do.

Self driving cars never will become humans and thus in the end never will have the flexibility humans have. They in the end will behave more like trains than humans. Other humans will be unclear about the flexibility layer surrounding self-driving-cars. This is a risk area in the trust people will put into self-driving-cars. Driver assistance is obviously something else.

So self-driving public transport can work in a save way because people know in traffic they are dealing with non human system. Self-driving-cars however should have an indicator when in self-driving mode, so other road users are made aware of the inflexibel nature of the vehicle, or they should be prohibited.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De EU en de crypto war! Overheid zie toch eens de kansen!!

  Naar aanleiding van het uitstekende artikel van Fred Hage in de Computable van  27 november 2020. Overheden worstelen met End-to-end encryptie en ‘lawful interception’. Met andere woorden privacy op internet aan de ene kant en de mogelijkheid criminaliteit te onderzoeken aan de andere kant. Het blijft me verbazen dat overheden blind zijn voor de kansen die dit dilemma biedt! Stel "ik kan bij de NL-overheid mijn encryptie regelen" (met de wetenschap dat ze mee kunnen kijken). Dan doe ik dat toch zolang ik niets te verbergen heb! Dus: Overheid wordt eens wakker en bied zelf encryptie services aan! Ga met de betrokken internet diensten zoals Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft .. etc. om de tafel zitten en ontwikkel encryptiediensten en standaards voor (vertrouwde) burgers waar ze gebruik van kunnen maken. De diensten kunnen dan vertrouwd verkeer van onvertrouwd verkeer onderscheiden. Ze kunnen vertrouwd verkeer direct, eventueel automatisch, onderzoeken. En me...

Annoying stupid smart functions in Google WorkSpace

Annoying stupid smart functions in Google Workspace. For the context. I had enough of Bill Gates, his marketing and pushy sales force a long time ago. And have abandoned Microsoft completely in 2014. I never ever will buy anything from them again. Certainly, not ChatGTP (Babylon 2.0 in the making). And when Zuckerberg showed up, I rapidly saw he was a second Bill Gates and I never installed any app of him, and never will. So from US big tech, I only use Apple and Google stuff. Google and Apple are king in “thinking for you” in the wrong way . Consequently, making your live less efficient rather than more efficient. This writing is about that, based on example cases. The first disaster I experienced in this regard has been the day that Apple decided to organize my photo's for me. With as a consequence, my organization of my history was completely messed up. After a year, I decided to take all my images away from the iCloud and put them on Dropbox. Now I organize my history myself. W...

Microsoft; Google; IBM all the same.

  Today, Microsoft announced https://cloudpc.im/. After they announced Windows 11. After the Windows 11 announcement, it rapidly became clear nearly no existing Windows 10 will be able to be upgraded to Windows 11. No coincidence. They want to move all customers to monthly payments. Soon you only can run Word, Excel and PowerPoint in a browser. Just like with Google! So what is the difference? It is all the same! You lost control over your data and your wallet!  What will be the countermovement?