Skip to main content

Brussels could do a better job

Abstract

Legal systems should enable good public services, not just complicate things. We (the people) don't really need governments, we need good public services. These days, too little is done to ensure a level playing field for companies on a global scale. Enabling big companies to lock buyers into their influence sphere and squeeze as much as possible money out of them.
Below three examples where our public services fail.

Selling hardware with preinstalled OS should be illegal

If a consumer buys a smartphone or a personal computer, it is always sold with an operating system preinstalled. This fixes the consumer into the commercial influence sphere of the hardware seller.
Apparently, the Brussels bureaucracy is not really interested in a plane playing field that enables European suppliers to participate in the smartphone and desktop computing market.
Would Brussels really be interested in a plane playing field, it would not be allowed to sell end-user devices (smartphones and personal computers) with an operating system preinstalled. Although Canonical tried really hard to enter the smartphone market with Ubuntu-Touch, they never had a fair change, for example.
With modern memory cards available, there is no practical excuse for hardware suppliers anymore. They can sell the hardware together with the operating system install procedure on a microSD card. For the user, the experience is the same as the hardware with a preinstalled operating system. That is, if the user wants to be locked in into the hardware supplier's influence sphere. If the user does not want this, the user can buy another OS. Imagine an iPhone with Android or Ubuntu-touch. Wouldn't that be great!
 

S.I.M. swap scam is caused by “governments”

The SIM card (also eSIM) should be regarded as an extension of one's identity, and thus should be provided by the government and not by telecom providers. The city hall should be the place where to buy a SIM and connect it to a phone number. IN PERSON! After that, the buyer can link is to a telecom provider.

Free services illusions are allowed by “governments”

How is it possible that we can “legally” get free-services which steal our privacy? It should be prohibited to provide “free” services.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The end of Windows is underway

Thanks to the virtual machine (VM) revolution, slowly but surely UX (unix like) operating systems are becoming the defacto industry standard. All Apple OS-es are UX based. Android is UX based. All internet is UX based. The whole Linux family of OS-es are UX based. The only remaining exception is Windows. The virtual machine revolution and cloud based (UX) computing is nail in the coffin for Windows however. Now  Google acquired Cameyo and with that brings Windows apps to ChromeOS. It is only a matter of time and all the functionality only available on Windows will be available as a SaaS or ( first  in VM mode) on Linux. All companies (for example SolidWorks ) start to offer SaaS, forced by the market. They feel the pressure  of OnShape . Most development work is already done on Linux based machines. Windows is also becoming legacy because there is extra cost involved to make apps for Windows compatible  with the newest generation of hardware (linke Tablets). This is...

Inconsistency in legislation

Good BDO Netherlands July 20 writes about the privacy paradox between PSD2 and the GDPR . PSD2 is a new European directive aimed at payment transactions in Europe. The law has five goals: Competition in the European payment market. Make innovations in the payment system better possible. Protect consumers better. Increase the security of payments. Contribute to a single European payment market. "However, where PSD2 requests open access to (confidential) transaction data, the GDPR imposes stricter requirements with regard to allowing this data and security to be shared." This is just one of the examples showing that the legislative process has completely got out of hand. How come? What is the quality of legislation? And is there something to do about it? How it comes In a word "islands". Too many people are involved in the legislative process in Europe. It certainly concerns thousands and perhaps tens of thousands of people. These work for different governments, diffe...