Skip to main content

Issuing phone numbers, a failing public service.

The unreliable ID?

In many articles, the IT industry complains about the fussy nature of the phone number as a reliable ID. For example, in this article. What wend wrong?

The ITU It was original set up by governments to resolve international issues on standards for telecommunication. One of their standards is the Telephone numbering plan. This telephone numbering plan was set up in a time of fixed landlines, never considering mobile personal use.

Who has ownership?

Let's have a look at the international public telecommunication numbering plan E.164.
The first 3 digits are the country code or country calling code. Counties control the subscribers assignment in the networks of the member countries. So countries have jurisdiction over the subscriber assignment in the country networks.
In that regard, the county calling code is the jurisdiction code! National governments have ownership!

To me, it looks like governments fail to provide the public service we (the people) could expect from them. We should be able to obtain a phone endpoint subscriber number from our government. And link it to a service provider of our own liking. The telecom business had (in the fixed line area) a technical interest to be responsible for subscriber numbers in their network. But that is not the nature of the telecom business anymore.

Who (with deep pockets) is going to sue a government?

SIM Hijacking / SIM swap scam can only happen because the subscriber assignment responsible party (government) is not in the loop of mobile number portability. The governments don take their responsibility.
It is about time that companies as Twitter and Google are starting legal cases against governments not taking their responsibility.
How can governments ask for a check on the authentication of a Twitter account holder when they fail in taking responsibility for their role in number issuing?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brussels could do a better job

Abstract Legal systems should enable good public services, not just complicate things. We (the people) don't really need governments, we need good public services. These days, too little is done to ensure a level playing field for companies on a global scale. Enabling big companies to lock buyers into their influence sphere and squeeze as much as possible money out of them. Below three examples where our public services fail. Selling hardware with preinstalled OS should be illegal If a consumer buys a smartphone or a personal computer, it is always sold with an operating system preinstalled. This fixes the consumer into the commercial influence sphere of the hardware seller. Apparently, the Brussels bureaucracy is not really interested in a plane playing field that enables European suppliers to participate in the smartphone and desktop computing market. Would Brussels really be interested in a plane playing field, it would not be allowed to sell end-user devices (smartphones and pe...

The end of Windows is underway

Thanks to the virtual machine (VM) revolution, slowly but surely UX (unix like) operating systems are becoming the defacto industry standard. All Apple OS-es are UX based. Android is UX based. All internet is UX based. The whole Linux family of OS-es are UX based. The only remaining exception is Windows. The virtual machine revolution and cloud based (UX) computing is nail in the coffin for Windows however. Now  Google acquired Cameyo and with that brings Windows apps to ChromeOS. It is only a matter of time and all the functionality only available on Windows will be available as a SaaS or ( first  in VM mode) on Linux. All companies (for example SolidWorks ) start to offer SaaS, forced by the market. They feel the pressure  of OnShape . Most development work is already done on Linux based machines. Windows is also becoming legacy because there is extra cost involved to make apps for Windows compatible  with the newest generation of hardware (linke Tablets). This is...

Better laptop keyboard by Google than by Apple.

Apple was on the forefront of human interfacing. Not only technical but also emotional. The better feel of Apple products! In one area, however, they missed the boat. The keyboard! Google with their Chromebooks are catching up on the feel and user experience. Their keyboard experience is even better than the MacBook experience. Just take a look at the keys left of the space bar on a MacBook and the ChromeBook.    MacBook ChromeBook Apple needs 4 keys! Google only 2! Industry standard knows the Control and Alt key. But Apple has the strange legacy from the early days of Apple computing called the Command key. Apple wake up! Linux has become the industry standard (not knowing the Command key concept). Much more user would switch from Windows to macOS if they were not hindered by the stupid Apple keyboard legacy. Google makes the switch experience smooth. Apple makes it hard. Guess who will win?