Skip to main content

Issuing phone numbers, a failing public service.

The unreliable ID?

In many articles, the IT industry complains about the fussy nature of the phone number as a reliable ID. For example, in this article. What wend wrong?

The ITU It was original set up by governments to resolve international issues on standards for telecommunication. One of their standards is the Telephone numbering plan. This telephone numbering plan was set up in a time of fixed landlines, never considering mobile personal use.

Who has ownership?

Let's have a look at the international public telecommunication numbering plan E.164.
The first 3 digits are the country code or country calling code. Counties control the subscribers assignment in the networks of the member countries. So countries have jurisdiction over the subscriber assignment in the country networks.
In that regard, the county calling code is the jurisdiction code! National governments have ownership!

To me, it looks like governments fail to provide the public service we (the people) could expect from them. We should be able to obtain a phone endpoint subscriber number from our government. And link it to a service provider of our own liking. The telecom business had (in the fixed line area) a technical interest to be responsible for subscriber numbers in their network. But that is not the nature of the telecom business anymore.

Who (with deep pockets) is going to sue a government?

SIM Hijacking / SIM swap scam can only happen because the subscriber assignment responsible party (government) is not in the loop of mobile number portability. The governments don take their responsibility.
It is about time that companies as Twitter and Google are starting legal cases against governments not taking their responsibility.
How can governments ask for a check on the authentication of a Twitter account holder when they fail in taking responsibility for their role in number issuing?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

De EU en de crypto war! Overheid zie toch eens de kansen!!

  Naar aanleiding van het uitstekende artikel van Fred Hage in de Computable van  27 november 2020. Overheden worstelen met End-to-end encryptie en ‘lawful interception’. Met andere woorden privacy op internet aan de ene kant en de mogelijkheid criminaliteit te onderzoeken aan de andere kant. Het blijft me verbazen dat overheden blind zijn voor de kansen die dit dilemma biedt! Stel "ik kan bij de NL-overheid mijn encryptie regelen" (met de wetenschap dat ze mee kunnen kijken). Dan doe ik dat toch zolang ik niets te verbergen heb! Dus: Overheid wordt eens wakker en bied zelf encryptie services aan! Ga met de betrokken internet diensten zoals Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft .. etc. om de tafel zitten en ontwikkel encryptiediensten en standaards voor (vertrouwde) burgers waar ze gebruik van kunnen maken. De diensten kunnen dan vertrouwd verkeer van onvertrouwd verkeer onderscheiden. Ze kunnen vertrouwd verkeer direct, eventueel automatisch, onderzoeken. En me...
1 comment
Read more

Localization is not one class, they are four

It is rather stupid that localization and language in web-apps are the same. They are not one, but separate classes. While US English is the dominant language in science, the old Roman Imperial measurement system is not. One should be able to use en-US for spelling etc. While using metric measure; ISO date format and in numbers the ‘,’ for thousand separator and the ‘.’ for decimal separator. So there is not 1 class, there are four: language; measure-system; dating-system and number-notation system.
Post a Comment
Read more

Salary scale-up percentage under pressure

 In my earning norm model , I have lowered the scale-up to adapt to the crisis. What is the scale-up? The scale-up is the gross salary multiplier from the scale below. So from the bottom salary every next scale salary is multiply with the scale-up from the lower scale. This scale-up was 1.45 (thus + 45%). But this figure will come down the coming time because of the economic insecure times we are about to experience. Depending on the economic developments it probably has to be lowered in the coming months. I will follow the developments and adapt the model accordingly. Scale up It is now 1.3 (+30%)
Post a Comment
Read more