Skip to main content

Annoying stupid smart functions in Google WorkSpace

Annoying stupid smart functions in Google Workspace.

For the context. I had enough of Bill Gates, his marketing and pushy sales force a long time ago. And have abandoned Microsoft completely in 2014. I never ever will buy anything from them again. Certainly, not ChatGTP (Babylon 2.0 in the making). And when Zuckerberg showed up, I rapidly saw he was a second Bill Gates and I never installed any app of him, and never will. So from US big tech, I only use Apple and Google stuff.

Google and Apple are king in “thinking for you” in the wrong way. Consequently, making your live less efficient rather than more efficient. This writing is about that, based on example cases.

The first disaster I experienced in this regard has been the day that Apple decided to organize my photo's for me. With as a consequence, my organization of my history was completely messed up. After a year, I decided to take all my images away from the iCloud and put them on Dropbox. Now I organize my history myself.

With Google, it was the same. Picasa worked fine. Then Google+ came along with Google Photo, initially made a mess of my organization. Again after a wile. I installed Dropbox for Android on my mobile devices and got into control myself. Not being annoyed by Artificial Stupidity by Big Tech.

What kind of brand is Google, anyway? A search and advertising brand? A cloud brand? A ... what the hack brand? Why don't they have a separate brand for services like WorkSpace? Or for Images? Apple at least is clearly a hardware brand.

In my view, the current way of organizing data (largely online) is not in line with the need for a more environment integrated human existence.

The USA big tech is on a dead-end road. With the global demographics peak passed, we need smarter and smaller, not bigger and pricier.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brussels could do a better job

Abstract Legal systems should enable good public services, not just complicate things. We (the people) don't really need governments, we need good public services. These days, too little is done to ensure a level playing field for companies on a global scale. Enabling big companies to lock buyers into their influence sphere and squeeze as much as possible money out of them. Below three examples where our public services fail. Selling hardware with preinstalled OS should be illegal If a consumer buys a smartphone or a personal computer, it is always sold with an operating system preinstalled. This fixes the consumer into the commercial influence sphere of the hardware seller. Apparently, the Brussels bureaucracy is not really interested in a plane playing field that enables European suppliers to participate in the smartphone and desktop computing market. Would Brussels really be interested in a plane playing field, it would not be allowed to sell end-user devices (smartphones and pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Windows is underway

Thanks to the virtual machine (VM) revolution, slowly but surely UX (unix like) operating systems are becoming the defacto industry standard. All Apple OS-es are UX based. Android is UX based. All internet is UX based. The whole Linux family of OS-es are UX based. The only remaining exception is Windows. The virtual machine revolution and cloud based (UX) computing is nail in the coffin for Windows however. Now  Google acquired Cameyo and with that brings Windows apps to ChromeOS. It is only a matter of time and all the functionality only available on Windows will be available as a SaaS or ( first  in VM mode) on Linux. All companies (for example SolidWorks ) start to offer SaaS, forced by the market. They feel the pressure  of OnShape . Most development work is already done on Linux based machines. Windows is also becoming legacy because there is extra cost involved to make apps for Windows compatible  with the newest generation of hardware (linke Tablets). This is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inconsistency in legislation

Good BDO Netherlands July 20 writes about the privacy paradox between PSD2 and the GDPR . PSD2 is a new European directive aimed at payment transactions in Europe. The law has five goals: Competition in the European payment market. Make innovations in the payment system better possible. Protect consumers better. Increase the security of payments. Contribute to a single European payment market. "However, where PSD2 requests open access to (confidential) transaction data, the GDPR imposes stricter requirements with regard to allowing this data and security to be shared." This is just one of the examples showing that the legislative process has completely got out of hand. How come? What is the quality of legislation? And is there something to do about it? How it comes In a word "islands". Too many people are involved in the legislative process in Europe. It certainly concerns thousands and perhaps tens of thousands of people. These work for different governments, diffe...
Post a Comment
Read more